General Enquiries: 020 7561 1786 or Email: info@credit-union.coop      |       CU Loan Repayment Issues Only: 020 3763 8397  or Email: loansupport@credit-union.coop

Vicious loan shark who kidnapped borrower and broke his jaw jailed for seven years

A vicious loan shark who kidnapped a vulnerable borrower, forcing him to travel in the boot of his car to get cash and broke his jaw during an attack when he couldn’t meet a repayment has today been jailed for seven years.

Richard Dawson, aged 35, from Barnsley, appeared at Sheffield Crown Court where he was told by the judge, Mr Recorder Adrian Langdale KC he was clearly involved in ‘organised crime extortion racket’ and trapped his victims in a ‘cycle of debt and despair’.

Dawson, of Hill End Close, admitted charges of illegal money lending, money laundering and kidnap. He also admitted assault causing grievous bodily harm and assault causing actual bodily harm against one person and assaulting a second victim, causing actual bodily harm.

The case was prosecuted by the England Illegal Money Lending Team (IMLT) working in partnership with Barnsley Council Safer Neighbourhoods Service and South Yorkshire Police.

Mr Simon Mortimer, prosecuting on behalf of the IMLT, told the court Dawson was a ‘vicious loan shark’ who never had the authority from the Financial Conduct Authority to legally lend money.

“Operating outside the legal framework allows illegal money lenders to conduct their business as they so wish and under the radar of the authorities,” he said.

Mr Mortimer said Dawson was known to his two victims, a mother and son. In 2022 the mother asked to borrow money and Dawson lent her £5 but said she would have to repay double the following week and triple if it went to the week after. There followed a series of loans on the same terms and she became stuck in a cycle of debt.

The son also began borrowing from Dawson, and would hand over his entire benefit money, even if only a small repayment was due. On occasion Dawson would use his victim’s bank card to withdraw money.

The court heard it became common practice for the victim to be forced to travel in the boot of Dawson’s car to withdraw money from a cash machine.

CCTV evidence showed Dawson arriving at a cashpoint and parking before releasing the victim from the boot on more than one occasion. In one, the victim withdrew his entire benefit payment of £364.90.

Mr Mortimer said Dawson was known to intimidate borrowers with violence and on one occasion when his borrower could not repay the amount, he assaulted him, breaking his jaw.

He said it caused serious injury where part of the jaw broke away and penetrated his cheek. He has since suffered permanent facial disfigurement and has ongoing dental treatment.

On another occasion Dawson punched him leaving him with injuries including a black eye and also assaulted the mother by kicking her, knocking her into furniture.

Mr Mortimer said the victim was clearly terrified when speaking about Dawson and was fearful for his life.

The court heard that the alert was raised via a report to the England Illegal Money Lending Team and a warrant was executed at Dawson’s home address in February this year when various items were seized, including a bank card belonging to the male victim.

Financial investigations found that between 2020 and 2024 Dawson had sent 292 payments to 29 different people. A number of these transactions were annotated with the words ‘Loan’ or ‘Lending’.

Analysis of other accounts showed the total paid in representing repayments was £52,416.14, but this did not take account of cash repayments which were not banked or used for everyday expenses.

Meanwhile, there was no evidence of any legitimate income from employment into Dawson’s accounts. Mr Mortimer said: “Clearly the illegal money lending enterprise finances their lifestyle.”

Defending, Mr Sean Fritchley, said Dawson, a married father of three, was ashamed of his actions and only asked the victim to travel in the boot because he had his children’s car seats in the back.

But Recorder Langdale said the £52,000 mentioned was clearly the tip of the iceberg and he charged ‘extortionate’ interest rates targeting extremely vulnerable victims.

He said it was a form of ‘pure humiliation’ and the victim was treated ‘little better than an animal rather than the human being he was’.

He sentenced Dawson to 15 months in prison for illegal money lending and three years for money laundering, to run concurrently.

He was sentenced to 34 months for the GBH charge, 25 months for each of the ABH charges and four years for kidnap, all to run concurrently, meaning in total he was jailed for a total of seven years.

Tony Quigley, head of the IMLT, said: “Today we have seen a vicious, predatory criminal removed from our streets and we hope this sends a message that illegal money lending and associated intimidation tactics will not be tolerated.

“This man is a ruthless and cruel individual who deliberately targeted the most vulnerable people in the community, taking everything they had and leaving them with nothing. He knew they couldn’t fight back and took advantage of that.

“When they struggled to pay, he lashed out, causing serious injuries. They may recover from those physical injuries but the mental torment he caused was enormous and they may never recover from the trauma they suffered at his hands.

“Illegal money lending is a scourge on society; when it is accompanied by monstrous violence and physical intimidation like this it is even worse – and this is something we will not tolerate.

“The bravery shown by these individuals in coming forward, even though they were terrified of repercussions, is incredible. We can’t thank them enough for that.

“We realise other people may be in a similar position, but we would urge anyone who has any experience of illegal lending to contact us sooner rather than later so that we can take action to keep them safe and help them escape the grip of an illegal lender.”

Anna Hartley, Barnsley Council’s Executive Director for Public Health and Communities, said: “This was an awful crime and we’re grateful to the England Illegal Money lending Team and South Yorkshire Police who worked closely with our own Safer Communities team in bringing this defendant to justice.

“It’s unacceptable to prey on those who suffer financial hardship and exploit them through threats and violence. We urge anyone with information about illegal money lending to reach out and report these criminals.

“We know the cost of living crisis has put huge additional pressure on lots of people. In Barnsley we have a range of information and guidance at our More Money In Your Pocket webpage www.barnsley.gov.uk/MMIYP.”

This year marks the 20th anniversary of the IMLT. Since its launch, the IMLT has supported over 31,500 people and written off over £91.2 million worth of illegal debt, securing over 416 prosecutions for illegal money lending, leading to 598 years in jail.

 

Anyone who has been affected by illegal money lending should call the Stop Loan Sharks 24/7 Helpline on 0300 555 2222 or access support online at www.stoploansharks.co.uk. Live Chat is available on the website from 9am to 5pm, Monday to Friday.

Previous

Next

How We Decide to Whether to Offer a Loan – The Basics

The Credit Union’s primary objective is to help members avoid or escape from debt by promoting a culture of saving. When we offer loans, we only do so if the borrower agrees to save a little while they repay. The establishment of a savings habit is proven to reduce the harms and risks of long-term borrowing becoming problem debt. Basically, when we get a loan application our decision is based on the following two principles:

1. Do we trust the applicant to repay the loan?

2. Can the applicant afford the loan repayment

This guide is designed to help members understand our thinking so you can best prepare if you should need to apply or re-apply for a loan.

1. Key Points in Our Assessing Trust of the Applicant

a) Has the applicant started saving? The money we lend is members savings so, especially at busy times, we have to give priority to loan applications from members who have made at least one savings payment. That first payment is good evidence that you are a real person and helps us confirm identity.

b) Proper Proof of ID & Address? What forms of proof of identity and address has the member provided? If you are able to connect your bank account through ‘open banking as art of the loan application process it a good way of proving ID. First time loans may be required to use online Open Banking.

c) Previous Borrowing History. Has the applicant borrowed and repaid us previously? Previous good repayment record supports any application.

d) Did the applicant inform us of other money owed? Failure to list all debts in the application process is likely to result in the loan application not being approved. It suggests that the applicant is either not in control of their money or not being completely honest with us and in either case we cannot put our members savings at risk by lending. Credit Reference Agency checks are used to show us what money is owed and to whom.

e) Is the member sensible with money? When we review the bank transactions of the loan applicant, we often see patterns of expenditure that suggest the applicant is not taking a sensible approach to expenditure. Changes in the way they manage their finances would suggest that the loan would not really be necessary. We want to help people be in control their finances and do not want to lend members savings to people who are not deemed sensible with the way they spend. This may be things like gambling, excessive shopping and/or eating out/takeaway food deliveries.

f) Always be ‘up front’ in your application. Honesty pays. We do not judge.

2. Key Points in Our Assessing Affordability for the Applicant

a) Is this loan in the member’s best interest? The value of the loan application in comparison with your income is a key measure of affordability. The loan interest members pay on loans pays our staff salaries, but we are not out to profit from you, rather we want members to borrow less over time and take control of their finances.

b) Positive Bank Balance at Month End? Is there money left in the members bank account at the end of the month that would be sufficient to cover the loan repayment if approved? If not, the member must explain how the loan would become affordable, for instance, by reducing expenditure in other areas.

c) Is the applicant struggling with existing debts? When we review the bank transactions of the applicant we can see income and expenditure. If the loan applicant tells us how the loan will clear other debts and reduce their expenditure this will help us understand affordability.

d) Is the purpose of the loan considered sensible? If the applicant is not paying essential bills such as mortgage or rent then a loan for a car or holiday is likely to be unwise and unaffordable.

e) Has the applicant fully explained why they need to borrow? Always feel free to email or call us explaining the circumstances that mean you need to borrow. The reasons for needing to borrow are complex, but being honest and explaining the circumstances can often help the ordinary humans on the Loans Team at the Credit Union to be able to assess trust and affordability. You briefly explaining your thinking about affordability gives us confidence that you are thinking sensibly about money, and sometimes allows us to suggest alternatives that may well be in your best interest.

f) Is the loan to clear other more expensive debts? Credit Reference Agency checks are used to show us what money is owed and to whom. If your loan application is to pay off other debts, stop and list every one of those debtors.Work out the cost of each. Consider clearing one or two at a time if its your first Credit Union loan. Pick them off one or two at a time, the most expensive first.

g) Has the applicant stopped to think about affordability? The ‘Your Money’ section of our website provides access to a budget planner which, if used and shared, gives us good evidence of affordability. Particularly helpful for loan applicants in financial stress. We hope this gives you an idea of how we decide yes or no to loan applications. The decision is by one or more other credit union members on our Loans Panel. We hope this helps you understand our thinking so you can best prepare if you should need to apply or re-apply for a loan.